network attribute|range
---|---
total nodes|7.0 - 183.0
total edges|1.0 - 515.0
network density|0.01 - 0.109
average degree|0.133 - 5.849
degree heterogeneity|0.466 - 2.556
degree assortativity|-1.0 - 1.0
average betweenness centrality (unweighted)|0.0 - 0.084
average betweenness centrality (weighted)|0.0 - 0.084
average clustering coefficient (unweighted)|0.0 - 0.704
average clustering coefficient (weighted)|0.0 - 0.25
Newman modularity|0.0 - 0.819
maximum modularity|0.0 - 0.896
relative modularity|0.0 - 0.922
group cohesion|0.073 - 1.003
network diameter|0.073 - 1.003
**Study description**|**value**
Species|*Microtus agrestis*
Taxonomic class|Mammalia
Population type|free-ranging
Geographical location|Northumberland, England
Data collection technique|mark recapture
Interaction type|social projection bipartite
Definition of interaction|An edge was inserted into the network whenever two voles were caught in at least one common trap over the primary trapping sessions being considered
Edge weight type|frequency
Total duration of data collection|6 days
Time resolution of data collection (within a day)|12 hours
Time span of data collection (within a day)|24 hours
Note|Networks represent social data combined over two consecutive trapping sessions at four sites (BHP, KCS, PLJ and ROB). Populations were trapped in �primary� sessions every 28 days from March to November, and every 56 days from November to March.
**Citation** | Davis, Stephen, et al. "Spatial analyses of wildlife <br> contact networks." Journal of the Royal Society <br> Interface 12.102 (2015): 20141004.